What kind of diet is best for maintaining the health of aging brains and bodies?
A common answer these days is the “Mediterranean diet,” due to a combination of recently published research studies and frequent media coverage.
In fact, a study published earlier this week found that older Spanish women who were randomly assigned to stick to a Mediterranean diet — supplemented by extra olive oil — developed fewer cases of invasive breast cancer, compared to women who were merely advised to reduce dietary fat.
This study was published by the same research team that reported earlier this year that Spaniards assigned to a Mediterranean diet — supplemented with either olive oil or nuts — experienced less cognitive decline. And a 2013 report from the same group found that the Mediterranean diet led to a 30% decrease in cardiovascular events (strokes and heart attacks).
Does this mean you should hustle to make sure your older relatives are eating a Mediterranean diet? Well, maybe. I will go into the study details later in the post, but for now, let’s say that the diet used in the study seems very sensible, provided one doesn’t suffer unduly from limited access to pork and cookies.
As is the case for many lifestyle changes that might affect cancer and dementia, a healthy diet reduces risk but is just one factor among many. Still, if we’ve learned of a good way to eat, why not consider it?
So in this post, here’s what I’ll review:
- Just what people were eating, as part of the Spanish Mediterranean diet study (known as the PREDIMED study)
- What kinds of older adults PREDIMED studied in Spain, and some of the major findings of interest
- Where to find a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence for diet and brain health
How to follow the PREDIMED Mediterranean diet
PREDIMED (Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea) was a big randomized control trial conducted in Spain, from 2003 to 2009. It involved 7446 peopled aged 55-80. In the next section of the post I’ll describe the study in more detail, but let’s start with what you are probably most interested in:
Just what was the PREDIMED Mediterranean diet??
Fortunately, it is possible to find the research study’s materials online, and they describe the recommended diet in detail.
If you can read Spanish, you can view the patient education materials via this PREDIMED website. This site also has recipes and shopping lists.
For a description in English, visit this PREDIMED site and click “Supplemental Appendix (NEJM).” A technical description of the diet is on page 9. To summarize, here were the dietary do’s and don’ts for those assigned to a Mediterranean diet:
Mediterranean Diet Do’s:
- Use olive oil abundantly for cooking, and for seasoning dishes
- Eat 2 or more servings of vegetables every day, with at least one serving fresh in a salad
- Eat at least 2-3 daily servings of fresh fruit (“including natural juices”)
- Eat at least 3 servings per week of “legumes”
- Eat at least 3 servings of fish or seafood, including at least one serving of fatty fish
- Eat at least one weekly serving of nuts or seeds
- Eat white meat (chicken, rabbit) instead of red meat, burgers, sausages, or processed meat
- Cook at least twice weekly with a sauce of tomato, onion, and garlic, which should be made by simmering these ingredients in olive oil. Use this as dressing for vegetables, pasta, rice, and other dishes.
- Eat two main meals of the day seated at the table; each should last at least 20 minutes
- Use wine as main alcohol, drink 1-3 glasses per day
- Consume the following foods as desired: nuts, eggs, fish, seafood, low-fat cheese, dark chocolate, and whole-grain cereals.
Mediterranean Diet Don’ts: Limit or avoid
- cream, butter, margarine
- cold meats, pâté, duck
- carbonated or sweet beverages
- pastries, cakes, donuts, cookies, puddings, custards, especially if industrially produced
- fries and potato chips
- Aim for less than one serving per week of cured ham, red meat, and fatty cheeses.
In addition to the above recommendations, half of the people assigned to the Mediterranean diet also had to consume extra olive oil (one liter per week) or extra nuts (30g per day).
Wondering how your diet compares? You can see the dietary quiz investigators used (in English) on page 22 of the Supplemental Appendix.
You can also view the recommendations for the “low-fat” diet, which was used as a control group, on page 23 of the Appendix. Notably, the low-fat diet recommendations discouraged cooking with oil or eating nuts.
In reviewing the Mediterranean diet, I was struck by the lack of limits on carbohydrates. (Note that the study period pre-dates the current trend to consider less gluten and grains, but then again having diabetes was one way to be eligible for the study.) Nor did I see anything about limiting salt, which is interesting given participants were at high risk for things like stroke and heart attacks.
I also wondered to what extent Mediterranean diet participants were encouraged to eat beans and similar foods; these are called “frijoles” (beans) or “garbanzos” (chickpeas) or “lentejas” (lentils), and I didn’t see them on the Spanish diet description handout that was given to participants, although those ingredients do turn up in the recipes.
The Spanish Mediterranean Diet Study (PREDIMED)
Now let’s talk a little about the study itself, so that you can learn more about whether the results are likely to apply to your family.
The best studies in clinical medicine, when it comes to assessing the effectiveness of a treatment or intervention, are “randomized control trials,” (RCTs). In these research trials, participants are carefully recruited, randomly assigned to receive some kind of treatment, and then are assessed for a health outcome of interest after some period of time.
Doing an RCT properly takes a lot of time, effort, and organization for the researchers; it’s much harder than doing an observational study, which is what many diet studies are. In a RCT, researchers have to specify at the beginning what kind of people they want to recruit, they have to decide which aspects of participant health to assess at the beginning, they have to deliver the intervention — and any placebo, or “control” treatment — reliably to participants for as long as the study takes, and then they have to properly follow participants and assess health outcomes of interest.
PREDIMED, as best I can tell, was a nice well-organized effort, in which investigators recruited 7446 older adults in Spain. The research team maintains a website here, and the study protocol is described here. The overall goal, as stated at the outset, was to study the effect of dietary intervention in older adults at high cardiovascular risk.
The main outcome of interest was having a major cardiovascular event, such as a heart attack or stroke. The investigators also studied extra issues in subsets of the participants, so the data for the breast cancer and cognitive decline reports mentioned above comes from those.
Participants were recruited in Spain from 2003-2009. To enter the study, participants had to be men aged 55-80, or women aged 60-80.
They also had to be at high risk for cardiovascular disease, but not yet diagnosed with actual cardiovascular disease. In other words, the study excluded people with past coronary artery disease, heart attack, stroke, or peripheral artery disease. (They also excluded people with “any severe chronic illness,” substance abuse, or “low likelihood of changing dietary habits.”)
To define people at “high risk” for cardiovascular disease, participants had to have either type 2 diabetes, or at least 3 of the following risk factors: smoking, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, obesity, or family history of premature heart disease.
Once enrolled, participants were randomly assigned to one of three diet groups:
- Mediterranean diet plus supplemental extra-virgin olive oil (1 liter of olive oil per week given to participants)
- Mediterranean diet plus supplemental nuts (30 grams of nuts per day given to participants)
- Advice to follow a low-fat diet
Participants in each group met with dieticians every three months. To know whether participants were sticking to their assigned diets, the investigators asked people to complete diet questionnaires regularly, and they also checked bloodwork yearly.
The research regarding the primary outcome of the study was published in 2013. Out of 7446 people, most of whom were followed for 3-6 years, 288 (3.9%) had a major cardiovascular event: a heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. People assigned to one of the Mediterranean diets had about a 30% lower risk of having an event.
An interesting editorial published in the New England Journal in 2013 noted that PREDIMED was ended early when the researchers noted such a big benefit (it’s considered unethical to continue a randomized trial if one group is clearly doing better), and that early termination of trials tends to “spuriously inflate estimated benefit.” A number of interesting points are made in the editorial, so I would recommend it for those who want to dig deeper into this topic.
To study the effect of the Mediterranean diet on cognitive decline, the researchers performed extra testing on a subset of 447 participants. These people had neuropsychological testing at the start of the study, and people with mild cognitive impairment or depression were excluded. Three-quarters of the initial participants had follow-up cognitive testing at the end of the study; average follow-up time was close to 4 years.
This cognitive sub-study found that participants assigned to either of the Mediterranean diets maintained stable levels of cognition, whereas the ones advised to follow a low-fat diet experienced a small amount of cognitive decline.
Where to learn more about diet and brain health
PREDIMED is a pretty good research study, as these things go. But the best scientific conclusions come from reviewing lots of studies.
When it comes to diet and brain health, we are in luck because the Institute of Medicine just published a report on cognitive aging earlier this year, and to prepare it, their experts did extensively review the scientific research on diet and cognitive health.
You can read the actual report online, in all its detailed glory, and the section on diet starts on page 124 here.
Their conclusion:
“Dietary interventions such as the DASH and Mediterranean diets appear to have promise but their efficacy and effectiveness need to be confirmed in additional clinical trials and community-based studies. While interesting and promising in some studies, the evidence regarding their effects on cognitive aging is too inconclusive to warrant recommendations for dietary change. Yet the evidence summarized here provides some justification for individual choices to eat less meat and more nuts and legumes, whole grains, and monosaturated fats, such as olive oil, to preserve cognitive health.” (pg 126)
DASH, by the way, stands for “Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension,” and is another healthy eating approach seniors might want to consider.
What to consider before applying research findings to your life
There are two main things to consider, when you read about research on the Mediterranean diet (or any intervention, for that matter).
The first: how similar are you or your relative to the study participants?
The second: how much of a beneficial effect should you expect?
PREDIMED was notable for enrolling people at high cardiovascular risk but not with diagnosed disease. So we don’t know how much of an effect the diet would have on a senior who has already had a heart attack. Still, it doesn’t seem likely that the PREDIMED diet would really increase the risk of problems for an older adult, and it might help. So it’s a reasonable approach for those who are willing to follow the dietary parameters.
Now, how much benefit should one expect? This is very hard to answer exactly, both for statistical reasons and because it’s fairly rare that we are just like the people who were in the study we read about. (We’re not Spanish, for instance.)
Still, it’s often possible to get at least a ballpark estimate. For PREDIMED and the cardioprotective benefit (the 2013 study), they found a 30% relative risk reduction. They also had 3.9% of participants have an event.
So let’s say you’re a person whose risk of a cardiovascular event over the next 4 years is 5%. (You can find a risk calculator online to estimate the risk for yourself or your relative.) If you reduce that risk by 30%, your risk would go down to 3.5%. This means your absolute risk reduction is 1.5%, and so you would have a 1 in 67 chance of avoiding a cardiovascular event due to the Mediterranean diet. (We can also say that the “number needed to treat” (NNT) would be 67; there’s an excellent NYT article explaining this statistic and how to understand the magnitude of likely benefit here.)
Want to be optimistic and expect the diet to reduce your risk by 50%? Ok, your initial 5% event risk would go down to 2.5%, your absolute risk reduction would be 2.5%, and your NNT would be 40. So you’d have a 1 in 40 chance of benefit.
Of course, if you are really high risk for an event, e.g. 20% risk for cardiovascular emergency over the next five years, then you are much likelier to benefit from an relative risk reduction of 30%; your absolute risk reduction would be 6% and the NNT would be 17.
Note that a NNT of 67 is nothing to scoff at. Statins are generally estimated to reduce cardiovascular risk by 20-30% and correspond to a NNT of 39-125, depending on the type of event being prevented.
But the bottom line is: many interventions can reduce risk, but they often reduce it less than people might realize.
So, a Mediterranean diet shouldn’t be considered a magic shield against cardiovascular disease, dementia, or breast cancer.
But different aspects of a healthy lifestyle can certainly add up. So go ahead, consider the Mediterranean diet studied in PREDIMED. You might even be able to replace a statin with a Mediterranean diet.
Just don’t forget to try to incorporate all the other things that are good for brain health, like avoiding risky medications and getting enough exercise.
Charlotte says
in your article you said there aren’y any beans or lentils. These ARE included unde the heading ‘legumes’.
Nicole Didyk, MD says
Thanks for the feedback, and you’re absolutely correct that those are all considered legumes. I think Dr. Kernisan was referring to the relatively low emphasis on legumes in the educational materials provided to the participants in the study.
sylvia says
Thank you for this amazing site as the information is in depth as opposed to simplistic overviews…
If you could provide any insight to my situation, I would appreciate it! I’m caring for my 93 yr old Mother who currently has CHF, CKD, LS, Lyme (recently) and once frequent UTI’s which are occassional since starting cranberry pills. She was getting them so frequently at one point, her PC at a community health center said they would not to deal with them and referred her to a urologist who actually said “let’s wait and see what happens!” I went to another who wanted to use a catheter and it was painful so we stopped it (the LS). Mom’s symptoms were not always burning but she would not be “herself” until she was treated with antibiotics – then she was fine…What are we to do if the PC won’t treat and the urologist refuses to accept a lab that indicates colonization AND the specific bacteria as well as the suceptible meds? (We live in a very small town)….Mom’s stenosis is severe per the tests and the neurosurgeon wanted to do a laminectomy but she wanted to try PT again and cannibus. It has helped but some days are very tough. She’s had epidural steroid injections in the past but she got a compression fracture last time. For 93 she is quite amazing, resilient, sharp and witty despite her myriad of health challenges. Any suggestions? Thx again for this excellent information! As her primary live in caregiver (who is chronically ill w late stage lyme) and limited support, I am always seeking info on her behalf! My goal is to ensure she is as comfortable and healthy as possible and I TRY to focus on prevention but she is stubborn and lovers her soul food!
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
Glad the site is helpful. Your mother’s very lucky to have you looking out for her. Well, she sounds a bit tricky medically. When people are her age and have so many things going on, it’s not always possible to fix or cure everything. You will have to find a balance between trying to help her and accepting that it’s not always going to be possible to get the outcome you want or she wants.
Re her loving her soul food: it is very important to pay attention to her priorities, what matters to her, and what seems to bring her great enjoyment. For people her age with lots of health problems, it often makes sense to let them eat what they enjoy. Now, with CHF, she may be quite sensitive to salt, and CKD sometimes benefits from diet changes as well. Just try to strike a balance. Typical “prevention” may not be what’s most helpful to her now; what’s most important is to prevent uncomfortable symptoms. Hope this helps and good luck!
Stephanie Bostic says
It’s worth noting that true double blinded randomized controlled trials– the ideal held up as the standard of evidence that leads one to proceed with enthusiasm in medicine– is nearly impossible when examining full dietary patterns. This is one of the reasons that there remain hesitations about recommending Mediterranean-style or DASH diets. In the field of nutrition, the body of evidence is generally considered to be substantial enough for it to be a good practice for adults who are willing and able to incorporate key aspects into their diets (and I do to clients). The newest Dietary Guidelines is beginning to reflect this, but policy does run behind research!
It’s possible to do double blinded RCTs when you provide participants with a processed slice of pumpkin bread with an unknown type or amount of fat in it (but it can be hard to formulate that pumpkin bread!). To truly process so many food ingredients into forms not easily identified by the participants would most likely alter their chemical composition in some important ways (example: destroying heat-sensitive vitamins).
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
Yes, it’s true that it’s difficult to do really high-quality rigorous research in nutrition. Also there seems to be a lot of individual variation in how people respond to certain foods and diets, so I suspect that fairly soon we’ll move towards a more personalized nutrition approach, where we have better tools to determine how a person is responding to a diet and adjust accordingly.
Albert John WILSON says
i am a 8y year old male person who lost my balance and also got dizziness with it ans i am now in the process of trying to find out the main cause of it and have had c/t of my brain which found no problems so a neurologist said to have a mri which i did my results came back as in conclusive owing to my head movement but he still said to me that my small vessels were not getting enough oxygen owing to them plaque shrinking the passages in a similar way to cholesterol and is more than likely the cause of my loss of balance and dizziness and said there was nothing he could do to eliminate it but after searching the net for answers i have now decided to start on a course of beetroot,carrot,apple and ginger juices only using vegetable oils in cooking and eating fish and chicken as my main meets i have had lots of problems health wise since 2002 a radical bladder removal operation owing to cancer with many uti’s over several years have also through those am now been on dialysis since 2010 also have got 3 stents in my heart a pacemaker and just recently had a tia so you can see i am not in very good condition but would like to know your thoughts about what i am trying and i will give you updates if you would like me to of how i am progressing
Regards
Albert Wilson
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
Well, it sounds like they saw signs of cerebral small vessel disease on your MRI. This would not be surprising, both based on you being in your 80s and also you have had stents, which are usually placed to help treat coronary artery disease.
Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: What to Know & What to Do
My understanding is that we don’t yet know exactly what diets are most likely to slow or reverse atherosclerosis. Certainly, lots of fruits and vegetables seems advisable, along with less sugar, fewer simple carbs, and minimal processed foods.
There are some medical doctors who have written popular books on brain health and/or heart health, they tend to make more specific dietary recommendations, you could get more ideas on dietary changes to try from those books.
I cover ways to address cardiovascular risk factors in this article: How to Address Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Better Brain Health: 12 Risks to Know & 5 Things to Do
Otherwise, if you are struggling with your balance, I would recommend a comprehensive evaluation and consideration of physical therapy to improve balance and lower leg strength. These have been shown to help older adults at high risk for falls, they help strengthen the body and train the brain to compensate for existing deficits. Learn more here: 052 – Maintaining Mobility & Preventing Falls in Aging: Myths & Truths.
Good luck and take care!
Linda Benskin, PhD says
The investigators de-emphasize one VERY important detail: They eliminated from the results the participants who consumed more than a maximum number of calories overall. This study parameter caused them to eliminate twice as many participants in each of the Mediterranean diet groups as in the low fat group. Although overall caloric intake is not the only thing that matters, it may be significant. We cannot know from this study, because the made this interesting choice.
We do know that the Mediterranean diet is more likely to result in participants eating too many calories.
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
So, the PREDIMED study has been critiqued for a variety of reasons, but this is the first time I’ve heard this particular issue raised. It would be extremely surprising and unusual for researchers to eliminate participants for such a reason, it would basically make the study unpublishable in a serious journal. If you randomized participants, you have to analyze them.
Now, I did just review the study in detail and what I see is that people did drop out of the study (which always happens in a trial) and that more people dropped out of the low-fat group compared to the other group. The study investigators compared the characteristics of the drop-outs to those who remained in the study, and in the results, they note that dropouts had a higher BMI.
One common critique of PREDIMED is that the low-fat “control” arm was probably quite high in carbs. These days, experts increasingly believe that a high-carb diet might be harmful (at least to certain types of individuals), and so the “control” in this study was not as benign as the investigators perhaps had originally intended.
PREDIMED itself did not report on weight outcomes for participants. Those results were published in a subsequent “secondary analysis,” they are available here:
Effect of a high-fat Mediterranean diet on bodyweight and waist circumference: a prespecified secondary outcomes analysis of the PREDIMED randomised controlled trial
Brenda Smith-Lunam says
I really appreciate your articles. The depth, the insight and the detailed explanation in all of your postings are so helpful. Thank you for taking the time to write. Thank you for caring.
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
Thank you, glad you are finding the articles helpful.
Vaughn Hamilton says
I’ve just got to say….your articles are well beyond the usual level of medical advice and explanation given. I’m a provider who spends a considerable time reading the literature, and your writings are amazing. Thank you so much for the time and energy you invest in the health of the rest of us. Seriously.
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
Thank you!
Omat says
My mom started as depression,now she is diagnosed with ADLS. What can I do?
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
I’m sorry but I’m not sure what you mean by “ADLS.”
On this site, “ADLs” usually refers to Activities of Daily Living. But that’s not a diagnosis…it’s a category of key life tasks that we often assess, as described here: What are Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) & Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)?
Sharon Krinard says
My cardiologist,Dr. Mark Nathan, told me about a study where patient takes BP 4 X daily for 1 week every quarter and takes the average of each quarter. I have been doing this for 2 years. I am 78 and have been able to eliminate the 4th BP medication I was on by tracking my BP. Keeping a record and working with my doctor gives me a sense of control.
Leslie Kernisan, MD MPH says
Great that you are tracking your BP and being proactive with your health!
I have more information on measuring BP and finding the right medications here: 6 Steps to Better High Blood Pressure Treatment for Older Adults. In this article, there’s a link to an expert guideline which recommends that people check BP at home twice a day for a week. Not sure if 4x/day is much better than 2x/day, but checking several days in a row at home is certainly a good idea.
What is most important is to avoid making medication changes based on a single rushed office BP, because those are often not reflective of people’s usual BP.
Hope your BP control continues to go well.